‘Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored,’
(attributed to Aldous Huxley)
Perhaps one of the greatest enemies of responsible behavior is to be found in the remoteness that often exists between cause and effect. It is so much easier not to have a conscience about our behavior where the consequences of our actions are not directly experienced.
Much has been made in the media of late about the supply by the UK of tear gas to the Middle East and whether it has been used in the latest people uprisings. How ethical is this? It seems that as long as the weapons, security equipment, training, etc. are not used by the purchasers for people oppression, then that is OK? Come on now, why else would some of these countries want to buy our war related goods and services? Let’s get real.
What, I wonder, does it feel like to manufacture riot control products like tear gas and know how these are being used? I could not be involved in such a thing. Or could I? Perhaps some of the shares in my pension plan support unethical companies? It seems that money rules our hearts as well as our heads. And it doesn’t stop there. Someone designs these things, someone else will pack them up, then there is the shipping, the transport, the office back up, invoicing, sales, etc etc. Do those of us who are involved in any way, however small, have no imagination, no compassion, no empathy for fellow human beings?

There is a good article in the Guardian, by John Kampfner, When tyrants want tear gas, the UK has always been happy to oblige.
No comments:
Post a Comment